Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03407
Original file (BC 2014 03407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03407

  					COUNSEL:  NONE

					HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Post 9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) be 
approved.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He submitted his TEB on 19 Jul 11, during a time period where 
his organization’s email domain was moving to a different Air 
Force Base.  Subsequently, he never received an email notifying 
him his application was not accepted.

Because his enlistment would be complete in Jul 2014, he thought 
he met the Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) requirement for 
retainability.  Unbeknownst to him, he was 17 days short.  

While preparing for retirement, he discovered the TEB request 
was not approved, so he is trying to correct it now.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant entered the Regular Air Force on 23 Jun 92.

On 20 Jul 11, the applicant initially applied for TEB, on 3 Aug 
11 the application was rejected because the applicant did not 
sign the Statement of Understanding.

On 19 Mar 14 the applicant signed the DD Form 2648, 
Preseparation Counseling Checklist, acknowledging that he had 
received counseling on the Post 9-11 GI Bill, Chapter 33.

On 31 Oct 14, the applicant was relieved from active duty and 
retired, effective 1 Nov 14.  He was credited with 22 years, 4 
months and 8 days of active service.   

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  The MilConnect website provides a 
message to TEB applicants stating “YOUR TRANSFER REQUEST IS NOT 
FINAL UNTIL YOU DIGITALLY SIGN AF FORM 4460 (POST 9/11 GI BILL 
TRANSFER OF EDUCATIONAL BENEFITS STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING) IN 
VIRTUAL MPF.  Within 72 duty hours, you will receive an Air 
Force Personnel Center (AFPC) email with “TEB INCIDENT” in the 
subject line, stating that your AF Form 4406 is ready for 
signature.  If you DO NOT receive this email, call the Total 
Force Service Center (TFSC) at 1-800-525-0102 ASAP!  Please note 
the following (1) Do not transfer benefits unless you are 
willing to complete the service obligation.  While you may 
revoke your transfer at any time, a revocation DOES NOT 
automatically cancel the associated ADSC, even if benefits have 
not been used.  (2)  If you have an APPROVED retirement 
application, you are NOT ELIGIBLE to submit a TEB request.  (3) 
Individuals undergoing an evaluation by a Medical Evaluation 
Board (MEB) or Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) should call the 
TFSC before submitting a transfer request.”  

Additionally, the initial notification sent to the member on   
20 Jul 11 explained the requirement to sign the TEB SOU and 
obtain the required retainability in order for his application 
to be approved.  Though the member states he did not receive 
email communication from the TFSC, the message presented to him 
during the TEB application process outlined completion of the 
TEB SOU as a mandatory requirement for TEB approval.  He was 
instructed to contact the TFSC if he did not receive an email 
within 72 hours.  The member did contact the TFSC on 3 Aug 11 to 
ask “What was required to restart the process.”  No attempt was 
made to reapply for TEB until 8 Apr 13.  The second application 
was also rejected because the member failed to meet the two 
requirements for TEB approval.  Because he now has an approved 
retirement effective 1 Nov 14, he is ineligible for TEB because 
he cannot agree to the required four year ADSC.   

The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 10 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
While we acknowledge the applicant’s request to have Post-9/11 
GI Bill transfer of education benefits approved, we do not 
believe he has demonstrated evidence of an injustice, as 
compared to others in his similar situation.  Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the requested relief. 


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-03407 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Aug 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 27 Aug 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Oct 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03671

    Original file (BC 2013 03671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03671 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The effective date of his Post-9/11 Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) election and his associated four-year active duty service commitment (ADSC) begin on 16 Mar 10. Had the applicant completed his election to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00189

    Original file (BC 2014 00189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) website, it notifies the applicants that their transfer request is not final until the SOU is digitally signed in the Virtual Military Personnel Flight (vMPF). On 12 Oct 10, an email was sent to the applicant informing her that her application for TEB had expired because she did not sign the SOU. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04592

    Original file (BC 2013 04592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04592 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His active duty service commitment (ADSC) for his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) be changed to 21 Apr 11, instead of 30 Apr 15. On 20 May 13, more than two years after extending his enlistment for TEB, AFPC notified him that the TEB transfer did not occur because he did not sign the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03064

    Original file (BC 2013 03064.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted the application to transfer the Post-9/11 GI Bill on 18 January 2011. The SOU was never received. The applicant was sent an email on 19 January 2011 requesting his signature on the SOU.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02905

    Original file (BC-2012-02905.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, stating, in part, that based onthe information reported in the TEB and counseling notes inRight Now Technology (RNT) by the Total Force Service Center(TFSC) personnel, the applicant was provided all instructions/requirements needed prior to the TEB applicationapproval; specifically, the requirement to sign a Statement ofUnderstanding (SOU) agreeing to the obligated service incurredfor participating in the TEB option under the Post-9/11 GI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03131

    Original file (BC 2014 03131.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no record the member signed his SOU on 18 Feb 10. DPSIT recommends the member’s date of TEB application be changed to 18 Feb 10 and the ADSC date be adjusted to 17 Feb 11, due to the fact that he did not receive emails instructing him to sign the SOU. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03131 in Executive Session on 11 May 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member All members voted to correct the records as recommended.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01734

    Original file (BC-2012-01734.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He knew there was a four year ADSC with the transfer but was completely unaware there was a form to sign at the time of submission for approval. He was sent an email on 13 Jun 2011 requesting he sign and return the SOU. He has served 17 years of service in the United States Air Force and as an officer takes integrity very seriously.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03459

    Original file (BC 2014 03459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The message states in part: "Within 72 hours you will receive an Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) email with "TEB INCIDENT" in the subject line, stating that your AF Form 4406 is ready for signature. The date on the SOU provided by the applicant reads “9/6/2011”. The applicant did not complete the TEB SOU and therefore his 20 May 11 TEB application could not be approved.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01486

    Original file (BC 2014 01486.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The member states that he reapplied for the benefit which also required a reenlistment well beyond 20 years of service. Examiner’s Note: According to the DD Form 4/1, the applicant would have had the retainability required for TEB at the time of his Jul 11 submission. Without a signed SOU, the TEB application cannot be approved.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01383

    Original file (BC 2014 01383.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records be corrected to show he was able to complete transfer of educational benefits (TEB) under the Post-9/11 GI Bill on 8 Aug 11, establishing an active duty service commitment (ADSC) of 7 Aug 15. When accessing the DMDC website for TEB, a message from “Your Service Component” appears, which says that the transfer request is not final until the member digitally signs the Air Force Form 4406, Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits Statement of Understanding, and if members...